Taxonomies of Artificial Intelligence
There are at least five ways to position AI in
the enterprise landscape:
- By processing method: batch, micro batch and real time
- By algorithm type: pattern recognition, clustering, associations, scoring, predictive, classification, text, speech and image mining, …
- By data type: high vs low dimensionality, graph data, self-describing data vs structured schema data, machine vs human sourced data, mediated data registration vs direct data registration,…
- By data behaviour: volatile vs stable data values, long vs data persistency,
- By analytics goals and or business process: churn prevention, prospect qualification, complex evaluations of loan applications, CVs, customer feedback, basket analysis, next best action proposals, fraud detection …
The enterprise architect will choose the relevant
combinations between these taxonomies to produce a coherent end-to-end vision
on the architecture. A possible selection criterion is the governance model
used in the organisation. In a business monopoly analytics goals will be
leading and combined with algorithm type. In an
IT monopoly processing methods combined with data behaviour is the most
probable direction and in a duopoly, well,… that depends.
Let’s do an exercise and suppose this is the
outcome of a duopoly governance model: combining the processing method with the
algorithm type to indicate which processing method is most suited for the
chosen algorithm type. Using this schema may help to manage expectations
between the business and the IT people better.
Batch
|
Micro
batch
|
Real
time
|
|
pattern recognition
|
Ideal method for large data sets
|
Suited for simple patterns
|
Only as a binary in/out of pattern decision
which implies a large (batch) training set
|
clustering
|
Ideal method for large data sets
|
Suited for simple clustering criteria
|
Only as Y or N adherence to an existing cluster which implies a
large (batch) training set
|
associations
|
Ideal method
|
Hardly possible
|
impossible
|
scoring
|
Develop a base line
|
Adjust the base line
|
Score against the base line
|
predictive
|
Develop a base line
|
Adjust the base line
|
Match with the trend
|
classification
|
Train the dataset
|
Classify new data
|
Simple classification
|
text mining
|
Train the dataset
|
Reveal polarity, topics, etc…
|
Deliver alerts
|
speech mining
|
Train the dataset
|
Reveal polarity, topics, etc…
|
Deliver alerts
|
Image & video mining
|
Train the dataset
|
Classify images
|
Deliver alerts
|
From this crosstab, it becomes possible to position
the concrete algorithms, the data sets and their life cycle management, the
ingestion volumes, timing and the technology to deliver on the various promises
made.
Other methods will give you paths to the same
end result: a coherent and methodical inventory of the landscape, linking
business processes to AI and data mining initiatives and routines as well as
the data and the applications to deliver the goods. Based on a gap analysis,
the enterprise architect can develop a roadmap that communicates with all
parties concerned.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten